Expressive and Instrumental Voting: The Scylla and Charybdis of Constitutional Political Economy
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Scylla and Charybdis
MY COMMENTS ON the future of Socialism are divided into three parts. The first deals with Sovietism, or Marxist Socialism modified by the Russian tradition, and its offsprings around the world. The second has to do with various hues of social democracy, from the vaguely Gramscian Marxist variety to the welfare state of mixed origins. The third deals with one reason why some form of Socialism ma...
متن کاملBetween Scylla and Charybdis.
The ethical dilemmas of treating fulminant (or subfulminant) hepatic failure with liver replacement have been apparent since the earliest trials of this procedure. Acute hepatic failure was the indication for orthotopic liver transplantation in only I of our first 237 recipients I and accounted for only 8 of the next 300.2 Our reluctance to proceed with more cases was that unlike candidates who...
متن کاملConstitutional Political Economy
Taking the view that constitutions are devices Whereby people coordinate to specific equilibria in circumstances that allow multiple equilibria, we show that a constitutional secession clause can serve as such a device and, therefore, that such a clause is more than an empty promise or an ineffectual threat. Employing a simple three-person recursive game, we establish that under certain conditi...
متن کاملDiabetes and Tuberculosis: When Scylla Joins Charybdis
Tuberculosis has been always considered a major health concern especially for low income countries. People with diabetes have shown increased prevalence of undiagnosed tuberculosis when compared to that of the general population.Research also indicates that those affected with infectious diseases are more likely to develop diabetes. There is enough evidence that demonstrates that people with tu...
متن کاملPsychiatric paternalism between Scylla and Charybdis
As much as strong medical paternalism should never be exercised, some weak paternalism towards patients is, on the contrary, part of physicians' and society's moral obligation. So far, this is a widely consented position in medical ethics. What then are the defining and the justifying conditions for legitimate weak paternalism in psychiatry? In this presentation it is argued in favor of three n...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Constitutional Political Economy
سال: 2004
ISSN: 1043-4062
DOI: 10.1023/b:cope.0000017963.81208.67